Everyone knows who the so-called “whistleblower” is.  His name is Eric Ciaramella, and his name has been all over the internet for over a week.

His information, if you want to call it that, was what he heard, from someone else, about a telephone call between President Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky.  In other words, second-hand hearsay, which is useless to anyone with any common sense.

And, in any event, the transcript of the telephone call was made public – and confirmed as accurate by both Mr. Trump and Mr. Zelensky – which means there is no “whistle” to “blow”.

Based on the transcript, therefore, Ciaramella was either misinformed or lying about what happened on the call. Because – as Ukraine President Zelensky has confirmed –  the “quid pro quo” involving aid to Ukraine and investigating Joe Biden’s influence in getting his son, Hunter, a big-paying no-show job he had no qualifications for, was neither mentioned nor implied.

So why is Eric Ciaramella’s name being so zealously guarded by Democrats?

Maybe it has something to do with what he really is, as described in Paul Sperry’s commentary of October 30, which first outed him:

Federal documents reveal that the 33-year-old Ciaramella, a registered Democrat held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

What this tells us is that Eric Ciaramella is not some principled “whistleblower” at all.  He is a an anti-Trump operative, in bed with Joe Biden and John Brennan (who is neck-deep in the 2016 election scandal about to be reported on by Inspector General Michael Horowitz).

In other words, he’s a political plant.  Plain and simple.

THAT’S why Democrats – with copious help from their accomplice media – are so desperate to keep his name, thus his background, from the public.

If there is anyone left who thinks this “impeachment procedure” is anything real, or that mainstream media are covering it as neutral journalists, maybe this will wake them up.

But, in truth, I’m not very hopeful.  That is because I suspect that most of the people who still think this is legitimate are so owned and operated by the politicians/”journalists” orchestrating this farce that nothing will.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *