Donald Trump says that the nuclear “deal” with Iran includes an agreement that, if Israel should attack the nuclear capabilities, the United States and the European nations which signed on to the “deal” will do what is necessary to stop them.
Is Trump nuts? Or isn\’t he?
Let\’s see.
Here is the passage that Trump is referring to, which can be found on page 142 of the “deal”, which promises…:
“Co-operation through training and workshops to strengthen Iran\’s ability to protect against, and respond to nuclear security threats, including sabotage, as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems.”
In other words, if Israel, in mortal fear that a country which, to this moment, is committed to its annihilation and the death of all Jews everywhere, decides to do something to prevent it, the USA and European partners signing on to this deal, will provide training and workshops to help ….. Iran, not Israel.
Does it say we will go to war on Iran\’s side against Israel? No. But it does say that Iran is the side we will support. Therefore Trump, therefore, is exaggerating the extent of what we promise Iran. But he is dead right about the direction.
Now: shouldn\’t we wonder how come Trump is so smart that he found this promise….but no one else seems to have done so – certainly not mainstream media?
The answer is that A LOT of venues picked up on it. But not mainstream media venues. They left it virtually unreported. Just as they left Paragraph 36 virtually unreported – which says that Iran can, at any time, claim it is dissatisfied with how the USA and/or other countries are keeping up their end of things, and get out – with all that money released when the sanctions were lifted – in as few as 30 days.
Click here and find a google page after google page loaded with them, all of which were reporting on this in late July, well over a month ago. But – having checked the first three full pages, I can assure you that there is nothing from NBC, or ABC, or CBS, or the New York Times, or the Washington Post, or the LA Times or….etc. etc. etc., you know the rest.
Even without knowledge of these beyond-belief parts of the “deal”, most people in the country are against it.
But imagine if mainstream media actually acted like journalists and let them in on what you just read about. Where do you think support would be for the “deal” then? And how many Democrat Senators voting in favor of the “deal” would have to reconsider their votes because of the resulting outcry? Enough to insure that if the Senate voted it down and President Obama vetoed, they could override him? It\’s an excellent bet the answer would be yes.
If so, it logically follows that the only reason this “deal” is going to pass is that mainstream media are intentionally withholding its worst parts from the public. Or, put another way, keep \’em ignorant and you own \’em.
And, yes, these are the same media people who squeal like stuck pigs if you call them biased.
Oh, one other thing: Trump also said:
“A baby could negotiate a better deal than that.”
Very hard to argue the point….
