If you support a unilateral cease-fire in Israel…
or if you support a cease-fire on hamas’ terms (i.e. hamas releases some – not all of the hostages in return for Israel releasing a far greater number of convicted prisoners who attacked Israel…
or if you demand that Israel must negotiate a two-state solution with hamas – which, in writing, calls for Israel’s annihilation, the death of all Jews and absolutely, unequivocally rejects a two-state solution…
or if you demand that Israel not go into Rafah and defeat the last battallions of hamas – the ones that are keeping it in power…
…then you are an abettor of, and/or an outright supporter of hamas.
Asking again what I asked in the title of this blog: why is this not a Republican talking point?
