THE REAL MAMDANI: WHAT “DUH DEMOCRATS” ARE ACTUALLY VOTING FOR

I call them “Duh Democrats”.

They are people who will vote for the Democrat regardless of who is running, what their past is, what they are proposing and what damage it will obviously do.  “They’re Democrats so, duh, I vote for them.”  (Yes, there are Duh Republicans too, but that is for another blog).

Here, via Rich Calder, Shane Galvin and Katherine Donlevy’s article for the New York Post, is a taste of what the Duh Democrats will be voting for in next month’s Mayoral election:

Lefty NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani gleefully campaigned this week with a notorious, gay-hating Brooklyn imam who is an unindicted co-conspirator in 1993 World Trade Center bombing and who has been linked to other terrorist activity in the United States — including urging “jihad” on the Big Apple.

The Democratic frontrunner to become the city’s next mayor was seen laughing and grinning while standing arm-in-arm with Siraj Wahhaj  at the imam’s Bedford-Stuyvesant mosque in a photo the socialist posted to X a day after the first mayoral debate.

Councilman Yusef Salaam (D-Manhattan), a member of the Central Park 5 who was elected in November 2023, was also in the photo.

Zohran Mamdani and City Councilmember Yusef Abdus Salaam on Friday met with Imam Siraj Wahhaj. X/ZohranKMamdani

“Today at Masjid At-Taqwa, I had the pleasure of meeting with Imam Siraj Wahhaj, one of the nation’s foremost Muslim leaders and a pillar of the Bed-Stuy community for nearly half a century,” Mamdani wrote on X of the Friday encounter.

Wahhaj, 75, who also heads the Muslim Alliance in North America, was fingered by prosecutors as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the 1993 WTC bombing, which left six people dead, and has publicly defended the plotters of the attack against the FBI and CIA, whom he at the time dubbed the “real terrorists.” 

During subsequent trials, Wahhaj testified in support of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman — the infamous “blind sheikh” and leader of a terrorist sect out of Egypt — calling the man a “respected scholar.”

The article goes on – and there’s plenty more damning material there (read it all and see for yourself) – but I think you get the idea.

There you go, Duh Democrats.  That is the “man” you are going to put in charge of your city.  Still happy about it?  Or does who/what he is matter at all, if there is a “D” on his line in the voting booth?

I have just one request of you.  Do NOT complain when you get exactly what you are voting for.  I don’t want to hear it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *