FOR ANYONE WHO DOUBTS THAT DOMINION VOTER MACHINES COULD HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED….

…read this article by Brian Lupo at thegatewaypundit.com (and be sure to use his link to read the first part as well).

A key (but far from the only key) excerpt:

To summarize Part 1, Dr. Halderman was able to use a simple BIC ball-point pen to reboot a Dominion ICX BMD by simply inserting it into the power button on the back of the machine and hold it down for five seconds. This rebooted the machine into Safe Mode and allowed Super User access, granting the attacker almost unlimited abilities to manipulate data on the machine.

Professor Halderman was also able to use a Smart card purchased for $10 online and a $20 USB Smart card Reader from Amazon to program voter cards that could be used over and over again, county-wide. He also made a poll-worker card and, most importantly, a technician card that would also grant “Super User access.”

We learned that commands to manipulate the Dominion ICX BMD could be automated – simply insert the card and it will do the rest. Further, nothing was needed that wasn’t public information to complete the programming.

These cards would require some expertise to program, but once the counterfeit cards are made, anyone could insert it into the machine and exploit the vulnerability automatically.

Ask yourself:  if this were true, and if this were shown at a public trial (which it was), would it not be news – enormously significant, important news – which absolutely should be covered by our mainstream media?

And if that is so, what explanation can you provide regarding why virtually no media have covered it at all…other than that they are compromised/committed to make this issue go away, thus immeasurably helping the political party that would most benefit from such voter-fraud capability?

And if that is your explanation, which of the two major parties would benefit more?  Would you assume it is the party that tries to scrutinize such voter fraud and insists on laws (i.e. signed ballots, voter ID, limited pre-election day voting, etc.) which would minimize the chances for fraud, or the party which fights every time such protections are either suggested or put in place?

And, if that your assumption, which of the two political parties fits each description?

Get the picture? I thought so.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *