BERNIE\’S DREAM WORLD

Ken Berwitz


In my opinion, there are two key reasons that Bernie Sanders\’ poll numbers have jumped so high so quickly:

1) He is currently the most desirable alternative to Hillary Clinton, whose recent poll numbers make the Titanic look like a flotation device by comparison.

2) He is a socialist.  And, whether a lot of them realize it or not, a great many Democrats have, gradually over the years, been taken, step by step, towards support of a European-style socialist state.  (This is why DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, when asked on two different occasions in the past several weeks, could not describe the difference between the Democrat Party and socialism).

Three days ago I blogged about “Bernie Sanders: The $18 Trillion Dollar Man”.  At that time I wrote that the Wall Street Journal estimated this was how much his proposals would cost, and said:

In fairness, candidates for the presidency make a lot of proposals, knowing that only some – maybe only a few – will ever come to fruition.  I doubt Mr. Sanders believes that all this money would wind up being spent.

On the other hand, Bernie Sanders is a self-professed socialist, whose answer to wild-eyed spending like that is to get the money from people who earn money – and the more the merrier from “the rich” (a term which is rarely defined).   So maybe he does believe all the money would be spent.

Well, today we have this, from Reena Flores\’ article at cbsnews.com:

Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders wantsseveral guarantees for America\’s middle class, including free tuition at publicuniversities and health care available to everyone. Those programs, accordingto an estimate by the Wall Street Journal, could cost the nation up to $18trillion.

But in an interview on “CBS This Morning,” Sandersdefended his campaign goals and fired back at the Wall Street Journal, sayingthat paying for his plans will hinge on holding the wealthiest Americansaccountable.

“We are going to ask the wealthiest people in thiscountry who are doing phenomenally well, and many large corporations that aremaking billions of dollars of profits and not paying a nickel in taxes, to infact start paying their fair share of taxes,” Sanders said early Friday.

When pressed if that meant he would tax the highest incomebracket at 90 percent to pay for his proposals, Sanders responded that hedidn\’t believe that was necessary.”I don\’t think you have to go up to 90percent,” the Vermont senator said.

I rest my case.

Incidentally, don\’t you love that last part, where he says  “I don\’t think you have to go up to 90%”?  Not “Of course not”.  Or “nowhere close”.  But “I don\’t think” so.

When someone answers this way, they are telling you that what you said may not be exact, but you\’re in the ball park.

So what can we conclude from the fact that Sanders is riding so high and Clinton is sinking so fast?

How about that a great many Democrats are really big on entitlements, they are really big on other people paying for their entitlements, and that, just as yesteryear\’s southern Democrats before the civil rights movement got votes by “out-segging” their opponents, Today\’s Democrats – at least in presidential terms – can get votes by “out-socialisting” their opponents.

I\’m not a Republican.  Never was.  In fact – despite my publisher\’s insistence that he call me a Republican when I wrote “The Hopelessly Partisan Guide To American Politics (to create a counterpoint with my Democrat/leftist co-author) – I\’ve never registered with any party.  But if I were a Republican, it seems to me that Bernie Sanders\’ move in the polls, coupled with his comments about how to fund his proposals, would offer a great deal of campaign material fro 2016, even if he doesn\’t win the nomination.

Will Republicans capitalize on this?  Based on their usual talent level for exploiting Democrat weaknesses, that is very much in doubt.  But who knows?  Maybe this time they\’ll finally figure it out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *