Here are the first two paragraphs of Curtis Houck\’s blog for newsbusters.org, about network coverage – actually, non-coverage – of the latest Clinton Foundation scandals:
After three pieces of news surfaced on Wednesday regarding the many Clinton scandals, the major broadcast networks refused to cover any of them and further extends the network blackout to five days since any of them were last mentioned on a network morning or evening newscast.
While the networks skimped on these stories, the Fox News Channel\’s Special Report offered a full report from correspondent Ed Henry that touched on news that a Democratic member of Congress has called for an independent review of Clinton\’s e-mails, a House committee hearing covered her e-mail scandal, and a report that Bill Clinton took in $26 million from a Swedish group that was lobbying the State Department on Iran sanctions.
And here are the first two paragraphs of Mr. Houck\’s blog about ABC news ditching it\’s own poll findings that found attitudes toward Hillary Clinton going negative:
On Wednesday, ABC\’s Good Morning America and World News Tonight neglected to cover the results of the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll that found Hillary Clinton\’s personal ratings are still tumbling along with President Barack Obama\’s approval rating which a Post article described as being “well behind historic norms”.
Concerning Clinton, the new poll that was released on Tuesday showed that Clinton\’s honesty and trustworthiness rating has fallen five points in the last two months and 12 points over the course of the past year while Americans widely disapprove of her handling of the deadly terror attack in Benghazi and her e-mail and family foundation scandals.
If you are not disgusted, and concerned, even scared, by the fact that one writer, Curtis Houck, from one blog, newsbusters.org, has provided more information about Hillary Clinton than all three news organizations combined…
… you should be.
I talk a lot about media bias in here. This is why.
