URANIUM ONE: THE REAL COLLUSION SCANDAL

1. Here are the first three paragraphs of John Solomon and Alison Spann’s article at thehill.com:

Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.

Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

If there is going to be an investigation of collusion between Russia and a candidate in the 2016 presidential race, tell me again which candidate it would be.

When does Robert Mueller and his Democrat-stacked star chamber get around to looking into Uranium One?  Its Russian component?  And the huge benefits Hillary Clinton and her family “foundation” got from it?  Ever?

Or is going after Paul Manafort for something he did years before Trump ever ran for President more important?

The one silver lining here is that, as John Solomon and Alison Spann continue to do the investigative reporting most mainstream media venues are, with increasing desperation, trying to avoid mention of, it shows us just how compromised they are…and justifies why fewer and fewer people trust them.