With great thanks to London\’s Daily Mail, here is the headline and sub-heads of its latest article on the bergdahl scandal…which clearly and concisely sum up the latest developments.  Do yourself a favor and click here to read the entire article as well:

Obamamakes \’absolutely no apologies\’ for Bergdahl terror trade andclaims Taliban would have KILLED POW if he had told Congress

Obama appeared in Brussels alongside British Prime Minister David Cameron during a G7 meeting in Brussels

He insisted that \’we had a prisoner of war whose health had deteriorated,\’ despite a fit-looking Bergdahl who appeared in a Taliban video during Saturday\’s hostage hand-over

Administration officials reportedly told U.S. senators Wednesday that they weer kept in the dark because the Taliban threatened to kill Bergdahl if a prison-swap plan was leaked to the public

But Congress was advised in 2011 and 2012 of two separate plans to make a similar deal, and nothing was leaked despite unanimous opposition

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Thursday that giving Congress 30 days\’ notice, as federal law requires, \’would have seriously imperiled us ever getting him out\’

Hagel said the decision to swap five Taliban leaders for Bergdahl was \’unanimous\’ inside the West Wing of the White House

• Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was told in advance, but he called it \’a big deal over nothing. …. What difference does it make?

Any questions?