You can take that title with or without the parenthesized word. Either way it is entirely accurate.
Tom Blumer, at newsbusters.org, has written an excellent – and devastatingly scathing – blog about just how completely the Associated Press\’s Charles Babbington is in the pockets of his apparent Democrat masters….with chapter and verse of how disparate what Babbington writes is from the truth.
Here is part of how Mr. Blumer introduces his commentary, which takes apart Babbington\’s Monday article:
Thefingerprints of Obama administration operatives appear to be all overBabington\’s report, both in what\’s included and what\’s left out. Mostnotoriously, there is no mention whatsoever of the VeteransAdministration scandal. Ah, but there\’s a specific reference toDemocrats who complain that the Benghazi and IRS scandals have been”fading from national headlines” except at thespecifically named Fox News.
I am not going to excerpt any more than that…because Mr. Blumer does such a complete job of comparing Babbington\’s babble with – believe it or not – the Associated Press\’s own articles on the subjects Babbington babbles about, that you have to read the entire piece to appreciate its full import.
I use the term Accomplice Media a lot in here. The Babbington piece is a great example of why.
.
