I will ask the question you just read in this blog’s title after you read the following excerpt from Mike Alby’s article at theamericantribune.com:
In yet another troubling scandal, liberal judge James Boasberg, known for temporarily blocking President Trump’s deportations of violent Venezuelan gang members, faces fresh criticism after revelations linking his daughter to a far-left nonprofit that actively opposes stricter immigration enforcement and pockets millions of taxpayer dollars.
Partners in Justice, the group for which Katherine Baosberg works, is a pro-illegal immigration NGO that receives over half of its funding from USAID and other government grants; it reportedly provides legal advice and representation to criminal illegal aliens; the judge’s woke daughter, Katharine Boasberg, is employed by Partners in Justice, a progressive nonprofit that reportedly offers legal aid to illegal aliens, including members of MS-13 and Tren de Aragua.
Adding to the scandal surrounding her employment at the woke nonprofit, not long after Katharine Boasberg’s father was assigned the immigration case, the nonprofit removed her biography page from its website, raising additional concerns about attempts to conceal potential conflicts of interest. Under the official Code of Conduct for United States Judges, judges must disqualify themselves when their neutrality is questioned, mainly when close relatives may have vested interests in the outcome of judicial proceedings, which Judge Boasberg did not abide by.
We’ve discussed boasberg’s overt conflict of interest in previous blogs. But there it is again, as plain as day.
Now my question: what if it were a hard-right judge with an overt conflict interest in the result of cases he was trying against a Democrat President?
Do you think the preponderance of our media would be as silent about it as they are about boasberg’s daughter? Or as silent about it as they are of the fact that boasberg, against all odds and probabilities, keeps “randomly” being assigned cases that affect the Trump administration?
Think about it.
