This comes under the heading “We got our unevidenced, BS attack out, everyone saw it, and now that it is indelibly imprinted in their minds we’ll put out a note admitting it was BS, to cover our asses”.
From the new york times:
Editors’ Note: Sept. 15, 2019
An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book’s account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.
How nice of them to belatedly add this trifling little detail….that the student Kavanaugh is supposed to have molested did not say it happened and does not remember that it happened.
The article’s writers, and the new york times, put out an unconscionable smear. And an after-the-fact “oh, by the way’ admission doesn’t even begin to cut it.
How can anyone trust this supposed newspaper again?
Oh, and there’s something else. Did you happen to notice that this disgusting smear-job is perfectly timed to the week that Inspector General Michael Horowitz has released the draft of his report on the actions of Hillary Clinton-supporting deep staters – i.e. defrauding the FISA court into agreeing to the Mueller investigation by claiming Christopher Steele’s “dossier’, that even he does not stand by, was verified?
Can you possibly think this is just a coincidence?
