HILLARY\’S LAST REFUGE

Ken Berwitz


You had to know this was coming.

If Hillary\’s fortunes are failing, it can\’t be Hillary.  So it must be something else.  And what better “something else” than invoking – again – the oppression of being a woman.

Excerpted from Alexander Bolton\’s article at thehill.com:

Women serving in the Senate say Hillary Clinton is beingsubjected to an unfair, sexist double standard on the campaign trail.

Criticismsof Clinton\’s tone of voice have become prominent in recent weeks, stirringstrong feelings among Senate Democratic women who say they too have had to battlethe stereotype of the shrill female. 

 “She\’soften judged by a double standard,” said Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), thedean of the Senate women. 

“Many of wewomen feel that there\’s a double standard. What\’s being said about Hillary iswhat women have heard for centuries. You\’re too loud, you\’re too aggressive,you\’re too pushy. Why do you want the vote?”

Femalelawmakers were particularly galled by recent statements by Washington Postcolumnist Bob Woodward, one of the nation\’s most respected journalists,characterizing Clinton\’s tone as “screaming.” 

“She shouts.There\’s something unrelaxed about the way she is communicating,” he said onMSNBC\’s “Morning Joe.” 

The commentprompted the show\’s host, Joe Scarborough, to interject, “I was watching herand I said to myself, \’Has nobody told her how the microphone works?\'” 

“I thinkwomen go through a magnifying glass that men do not. Look at [GOP presidentialfrontrunner Donald] Trump. Talk about braggadocio, talk about arrogance, talkabout shouting, talk about demeaning, talk about insulting. It\’s all there,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)

When askedabout the perception that Clinton shouts, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) quipped, “unlike Bernie Sanders who’s so relaxed.”

“He shoutsthe whole time. Give me a break,” she said.

The New YorkTimes reviewed her performance at one debate as “tense and even angry attimes,” while The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza called her “hyperaggressive” at another debate. Frida Ghitis pointed out this trend in a columnshe wrote for CNN titled “The shrill smear against Hillary Clinton.” 

What does this mean?  That people who notice Hillary Clinton often is loud and shrill when she makes speeches must therefore be sexist? 

Based on this article, the sexist contingent includes Carl Bernstein, the New York Times and Chris Cillizza.  All of them mouth breathing, card-carrying Tea Party Republicans I\’m sure.

Let me be very clear:  the reason Hillary Clinton is accused of often being loud and shrill is that Hillary Clinton often is loud and shrill.  That is not some concocted attack on Ms. Clinton because she is a woman, that is an honest appraisal of the way she makes speeches.  

What are we supposed to do?  Not call her loud and shrill because she is a woman?  We\’re never supposed to use those words, even when they fit?  If so:

-Does that mean we can\’t call Bernie Madoff a white collar thief, because he\’s Jewish and it plays to the stereotype of a thieving, money-grubbing Jew?  

-Should the feds have laid off John Gotti, because the accusations against him were a stereotype of Italian gangsters?  

-Will Bill Clinton now issue a statement that he didn\’t take out osama bin laden when he could have, years before 9/11, because it would have fed the stereotype of Arab terrorists?

Here\’s the news, folks.  People are what they are.  And if what a person is sometimes happens to coincide with the stereotype of a group that person belongs to, that doesn\’t change what he/she is.

Hillary Clinton is loud and shrill.  The fact that she is a woman is not going to stop me from saying so.  Why?  Because – one more time – she is loud and shrill.  End of story.

Oh, one more thing:  yes, Senator Feinstein, Donald Trump is every one of the things you said he is.  But don\’t hold your breath waiting for anyone to accuse you of stereotyping him as a man.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *