BIDENS AND BURISMA: HOW LONG CAN MAINSTREAM MEDIA IGNORE IT?

How long can mainstream media continue its blatantly fraudulent coverage of the Biden scandal?

How long can it attack Trump based on an unnamed “whistleblower’s” claim (What is his/her name?  Is he/she credible?  Does he/she have political motives?) that, during a telephone conversation with Ukraine President Zelensky, he pressured Zelensky to pursue an investigation of Joe Biden…

…while conveniently suppressing the fact that the investigation concerned an apparently dirty deal concerning Biden’s son, Hunter, and that Biden himself bragged about pressuring the Ukraine to have the investigator fired, by threatening to withhold $1 billion dollars in aid?

Here, excerpted from Scott Morefield’s article at washingtonexaminer.com, is the latest reason to at least hope this fraudulent house of cards about to tumble:

Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed he never discussed Hunter Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine. However, a July article from The New Yorker belies that contention.

“I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings,” Biden told Fox News reporter Peter Doocy on Saturday in Iowa before calling on President Donald Trump to be investigated over a phone call he made to Ukraine’s president.

The New Yorker article, titled “Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?” is an in depth look at Hunter Biden’s life and business dealings. It also contains a segment where Hunter apparently recalled discussing Ukrainian natural-gas producer Burisma “just once.”

In December, 2015, as Joe Biden prepared to return to Ukraine, his aides braced for renewed scrutiny of Hunter’s relationship with Burisma. Amos Hochstein, the Obama Administration’s special envoy for energy policy, raised the matter with Biden, but did not go so far as to recommend that Hunter leave the board. As Hunter recalled, his father discussed Burisma with him just once: “Dad said, ‘I hope you know what you are doing,’ and I said, ‘I do.’”

So Joe Biden says he never discussed Burisma with his son, Hunter.  Hunter,  who – I’m putting it kindly – is the black sheep of the family, says they did talk about it, but “just once” (just once, Hunter?  You sure?)

And we are supposed to believe that Joe Biden’s threat to withhold $1 billion of US aide to the Ukraine unless the the investigator looking into Hunter’s Burisma dealings was fired is just a coincidence?  A random thingie?  One thing has nothing to do with the other?

Anyone with at least a few functioning brain cells should either be gritting his/her teeth at that claim, be laughing derisively, or both.

But there is potential good news.  If the New Yorker put the lie to Biden’s claim just a couple of months ago, and the New York Times – which hates Trump’s guts – wrote a devastating exposé on Hunter Biden’s dealings in the Ukraine just last May, how long will it be before this can no longer be contained?  How long before the real story is no longer suppressed.  How long before it blows up in the Bidens’ faces?

With mainstream media in its current state, the possibility – incredible as it may seem – is that the answer may be never.  But, then again, maybe there still are enough “journalists” – real ones – out there, so that this story will be given the two-sided treatment it deserves.

Time will tell.