You, of course, know about the 413 pages of FBI material relating to that infamous “tarmac meeting” between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch last year, right?
What’s that? You don’ t know what I’m talking about?
To tell you the truth, I’m not surprised at all. In fact, it is the reason this blog is being written.
From Zenny Phuong’s article at cnsnews.com:
The Department of Justice on Friday released 413 pages of emails related to a controversial private meeting between former President Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch during the FBI’s investigation into then-presidential-candidate Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi emails. The FBI said earlier such records did not exist.
This discharge of information is the result of a lawsuit filed against the DOJ by the American Council for Law and Justice (ACLJ) in November 2016.
The newly-released emails mostly include DOJ officials’ conversations with reporters, who were seeking comment on the meeting between Lynch and the former president on an airport tarmac in Phoenix, Ariz. in June 2016.
The encounter raised concerns about the impartiality of the DOJ’s investigation into the Hillary Clinton episode, and became a significant issue in the presidential campaign.
The ACLJ notes that under the leadership of then-Director James Comey the FBI had originally denied the existence of such records.
The Comey-led FBI covering up the information they had on that meeting? And only releasing it because of a successful lawsuit – brought by an organization which has nothing whatsoever to do with mainstream media?
Am I supposed to be shocked by this? Well I’m not.
I’m not shocked that the FBI has material relating to this monumentally odoriferous meeting.
I’m not shocked that the FBI, under James Comey – who comes across as less honest and more compromised every time I hear about him – lied about the existence of this material.
And I am especially not shocked that this lie by the FBI is going virtually unreported by mainstream media.
It is crap like this that cause fewer and fewer people to trust these so-called “journalists”.
Now, let’s see what the ACLJ finds in those emails…and whether it shames these “journalists” into playing catch-up ball and actually telling their viewers/readers/listeners about it.



I hope we are able to find out what information was redacted out of those documents.