What does it take to prove to someone, even a hardline Democrat/Trump hater, that Joe Biden was not functioning as President of the United States for much – maybe most, maybe all – of his four years in the Oval office? That other people no one voted for were running the country (and running it into the ground)?
How about three – count ’em – three witnesses to this tidal wave of a scandal pleading the 5th about it? And who knows how many more?
From Libbey Dean’s article from Newsnation, via msn.com:
A third witness has pleaded the Fifth Amendment while testifying before House Republicans about former President Joe Biden‘s mental acuity while in office.
Annie Tomasini, Biden’s former deputy chief of staff, invoked the protection multiple times during a closed-door deposition Friday, according to Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chair of the House Oversight Committee.
Tomasini reportedly declined to answer questions about Biden’s health, his handling of classified documents and the first family’s alleged business dealings during the roughly 30-minute deposition.
“It’s unbelievable that Ms. Tomasini and others refuse to answer basic questions about President Biden’s fitness to serve,” Comer added. “It’s apparent they would rather hide key information to protect themselves and Joe Biden than be truthful with the American people about this historic scandal.”
Early this month, Biden’s White House physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, invoked his Fifth Amendment right and left his deposition shortly after arriving. Anthony Bernal, who previously served as chief of staff to former first lady Jill Biden, did the same last week.
Three insiders. Three people who would be in the know. And all three used a plea that protects them from self-incrimination. In other words, it protects them from having to say what they knew about Biden, thus admit they knew and hid his condition.
Could this possibly stink more?
And let’s remember that it isn’t just these three insiders covering their backsides. Our media were dealing with Biden every day. They knew as well as O’Connor, Bernal and Tomasini did that he was, at best, borderline functional, and probably a lot less.
Does anyone doubt that political bias was why they didn’t report this? Inform the public?
How can anyone possibly trust them to tell us anything political – or, for that matter, anything else – honestly?
