As Democrats and mainstream media – which just spent two years of wasted effort on collusion and obstruction of justice and are desperate to regain their credibility – continue their frenzy over a report that robert mueller didn’t like the way William Barr’s memo characterized his report, I have a quick question.
Since the report tells us that mueller acknowledges Bart’s characterization was accurate and not misleading…and in any event everyone now has the full report and can read it for themselves….
….what, other than Democrats and media desperately trying to regain their credibility, is the issue here?
Put another way: what is this, other than the Washington Post and New York Times reporting – on the day before Barr is to testify – comments by mueller that amount to nothing, but can be wordsmithed into looking bad?
This is supposed to increase their credibility?
Yeah, right.
