On the theory that groups which pay a politician running for high office a great deal of money for a short speech, in the hopes that they will get something out of it if that politician wins…and that the politician understands that taking a great deal of money establishes the indebtedness…
…here is a list of Hillary Clinton’s speeches from just 2013 to early 2015 – who she gave them to and how much she was paid (please also keep in mind that Hubby Bubba got even more in both years):
Well, well well. Look what we have here.
Almost $22,000,000 in fees. And look who paid them.
Goldman Sachs, of course. We all know about those speeches and the fact that Ms. Clinton has refused to release their contents – with copious help from our wonderful “neutral” media, which have been nice enough to bury this fact, and not either demand she produce the speeches or find attendees who might have taped them.
But what about Morgan Stanley? Deutsche Bank? Fidelity Investments? Apollo Management Holdings (about $23 billion)? Itau BBA USA – part of the huge worldwide group? Sanford C. Bernstein (managing assets in the $80 billion range)….and a ton more, which you can see for yourself above.
What about the speeches she made to them? What did she say? What do they expect for their huge payouts to her?
How can Hillary Clinton possibly claim to be a champion against big money interests, when those same big money interests are paying her tens of millions of dollars a year this way, and her husband even more?
How can anyone with even a partially usable brain believe her?
And why are mainstream media not asking these questions?
From these supposedly neutral venues, we got a couple of days about Goldman Sachs, then little other than silence. And nothing at all about all the other huge-money benefactors they can read on her list of speeches just as easily as I can.
WHY?
Other than being neck-deep in the Hillary tank, and perfectly willing to let her slide on this astounding level of hypocrisy so they can facilitate her winning the presidency, can you come up with a reason? I know I can’t.
I write a lot about how compromised so much of our media are. This is a front-and-center example of why…as well as a front-and-center demonstration that their philosophy is “keep ’em ignorant and you own ’em”.
