Suppose it were President Bush. Suppose he met, secretly, with “leaders” of a religious group with branches responsible for killing people by the tens of thousands. Suppose he refused to say which “leaders” he met with or what they discussed.
Do you think mainstream media would be all over it?
Then explain most of mainstream media\’s virtual blackout on this – excerpted from Charlie Spiering\’s article at breitbart.com:
PresidentObama met with American Muslim leaders this afternoon, accordingto the White House schedule, but so far the administration isunwilling to reveal who attended the meeting, which was closed to thepress.
TheWhite House released a readout of the meeting explaining that Obamadiscussed “a range of domestic and foreign policy issues”including Obamacare, police fairness, anti-Muslim discrimination, andthe upcoming Summit on Countering Violence Extremism.
WhiteHouse Press Secretary Josh Earnest defended the meeting during hisdaily press briefing, pointing out that it wasn’t “unusual” forthe president to meet with “a wide variety of communities fromacross the country.”
Butthe White House was unwilling to release the names of leaders whoattended the meeting.
Arequest to the White House for a list of names of those who attendedthe meeting was not returned.
Earlier this week it was reported that the administration had met with representatives of the Muslim brotherhood – as terrorist an organization as there is. Were they in attendance for this meeting as well? Were promises made to whomever was in attendance? If so, what were those promises?
Why does this administration refuse to tell us? And why do most of our mainstream media – Mr. Obama\’s Accomplice Media – again look the other way?
