Still waiting for mainstream media to seriously cover the Jonathan Gruber scandal and subsequent lie-a-thon? Well, keep waiting. Because they still are not covering it.
Jonathan Gruber is an architect of the ObamaCare legislation. He is the one whose economic model was used as the basis for ObamaCare.
And he is the one who has been caught on video telling us that the economic model he created to sell this unworkable monstrosity was carefully, tortuously wordsmithed, so it would look like something it is not.
Why? Because, if they knew the truth about its costs, voters would be “too stupid” to support it.
When the first video surfaced, Gruber claimed that he did not really mean what he said; it was just some off-the-cuff remarks he did not articulate well. But the fact that three other videos (so far) have now surfaced, each with him saying virtually the same thing, puts the lie to that claim.
Similarly, Nancy Pelosi\’s claim that Gruber had nothing to do with ObamaCare and she doesn\’t even know who he is, is a flat-out lie. There is video of Pelosi citing him by name…and a capture from her web site shows Pelosi not only mentioning Gruber as a major player in ObamaCare, but touting the economic model he created to sell it.
Not enough proof for you? Ok. There\’s more.
Today, the Washington Post\’s fact-checker, (lifelong Democrat) Glenn Kessler, tells us that the claim by Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) that Gruber was paid almost $400,000 for his work on ObamaCare, is 100% true. You can read all about it by clicking here.
Maybe it\’s just me, but it seems like $400,000 is a lot to pay for someone who had nothing to do with what he was being paid for.
So the lies continue…and the media cover-up continues.
Democrats lie, and – with a few notable exceptions, the Washington Post being one of them – mainstream media\’s reaction is to shut their eyes, put its hands over their ears, and sing LALALALALALALALALA as loud as they can.
Could there possibly be a clearer indication of just how deep media bias goes?
And could it possibly be more disgraceful?
