HOW DO YOU TRY TO OVERCOME A 70,000 VOTE LEAD IN PENNSYLVANIA?

Suppose you lived in a state with a 58% – 42% registration advantage for Democrats.  How do you suppose absentee ballots would fall?  About the same way?

Would you be suspicious if they fell 89% -11% for Democrats?   About as suspicious, say, as you would be if your five year old, sitting next to a half-empty box of cookies with cookie crumbs all over his shirt, told you he didn’t eat any cookies?

Pennsylvania has about a 58% – 42% Democrat registration advantage over Republicans…with Republicans usually outperforming that 16% registration disparity (e.g. in 2008, Barack Obama beat John McCain by 10% and in 2012 Mr. Obama beat Mitt Romney by 5%).

But in this year’s presidential election, a funny thing happened, between the preliminary final results and the certified results -i.e.  when they counted an additional 20,736 votes (presumably absentee ballots).  Somehow Democrat Hillary Clinton, managed to get 18,467 of them to Donald Trump’s 1,819.  That is an 89% – 11% difference, which shrunk Mr. Trump’s 64,403 vote lead to 47,755.

Here, from thegatewaypundit.com, is a chart with the actual data:

I have no conclusive proof that fun and games took place in favor of Ms. Clinton –  any more than that 5 year old’s mom and dad saw him eating the cookies.  But I do have an IQ above 53.

Now:  when do mainstream media make note of this amazing, thoroughly illogical count in Hillary Clinton’s favor?

Maybe when Jill Stein is serving her third term in the White House…..