I may not be the greatest strategist in the world, but I’ve always sort of assumed that if a political party wants to retrieve its formerly positive standing with a particular group – say several states which have just voted down its presidential candidate – the party makes sure to clearly show it considers that group valuable; important; an integral part of its plans.
With that in mind, please consider the following excerpt from Greg Nash’s article at thehill.com:
Unless I missed something, Hillary Clinton just lost the 2016 presidential election because Donald Trump unexpectedly won several key states in the midwest that Democrats usually win.
So what is their “strategy” for retrieving those states?
First they re-elect Nancy Pelosi as minority leader – a San Francisco hard-leftist who was completely on board with the the job-losing trade deals and immigration policies that cost her party the midwest – instead of the 33 year younger, far more dynamic midwesterner, Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), who understands exactly why the midwest was lost…
….and then Pelosi and her pals fill 15 leadership spots – , with exactly one going to a house member from the Midwest.
Has the Democrat Party gone nuts? Has it learned nothing from the 2016 election?
This is not a “strategy”. This is a suicide pact; one which I, as a strong proponent of a multi-party system, do not wish Democrats success with, no matter how hard they try to make it happen.


