With a major hat tip to commenter “free”, who brought this to my attention…
…I am about to show you a video with major, possibly game-changing, information about Philando Castile and his passenger (girlfriend? fiance?) Diamond “Lavish” Reynolds.
The commentator is Dennis Michael Lynch, who is with the conservative web site Newsmax.
And, though its contents – taken, I believe, from Ms. Reynolds’ own facebook page – would have been just as available to any mainstream media venue with even the slightest interest in finding out about Ms. Reynolds, Mr. Lynch is the one and only source I have seen it from.
I suspect you’ll need a bit of perseverence to get to the meat of what has been uncovered. the video is about 12 1/2 minutes long, and Mr. Lynch is far from the most engaging personality I have ever come across.
But if you do, you will almost certainly know that Diamond “Lavish” Reynolds – whose word is all we have in defense of Philando Castile’s actions in that car – is about the last person on earth to be trusted with telling the truth about what actually happened.
In fact, the real Diamond “Lavish” Reynolds is a disgusting pig who curses, drinks, and joins Philando in smoking weed while in the car with her daughter – thus inflicting second-hand weed smoke on the child..as well as her unborn brother (that’s right, she’s pregnant) – and couldn’t care less about doing so.
CLICK HERE to see the video.
If you don’t care to see the lead-up, which shows how Ms. Reynolds has presented herself to media as a sweet, warm, loving woman – a near-candidate for sainthood (which media apparently have bought into, hook, line and sinker), its key videos start at about the 6:00 mark.
And then please note that what you saw did NOT just come out; it was put on youtube.com July 11th – three days ago. Therefore, as noted earlier, any mainstream media venue at all interested in finding out who the one eye-witness for Philando Castile really was, would have been just as able to get this as Dennis Michael Lynch was.
Can you come up with any credible reason they didn’t bother? Any reason that would allow them to continue pretending they are interested in actual journalism, rather than building a racially incendiary case…which, of course, brings in more viewers/readers/listeners…maybe even a riot or too (which is really great for ratings)?
Maybe you’ll have better luck than I did. Because I tried and couldn’t come up with a thing.
Ken, I found another one where she lets slip that she most likely had filmed the shooting itself. It is in a press conference she does the next day. In the video she says at 5:00 mark
You hear Reynolds say, “…I was not able to get the actual shooting because I did not want that horrible act to be on social media…”
Ask yourself, how could she have known that a “horrible act” was about to take place, in order to base her alleged decision – to supposedly not start recording until afterward – on such knowledge?
She could not know of an impending “horrible act” …
Here is the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSmDFPz4Bx4
And here is the website I saw it at.
https://misadventuresindiversity.wordpress.com/2016/07/11/girlfriend-of-philando-castile-changes-her-story-did-she-withhold-video-of-the-actual-shooting/