Today’s paragraphs come to us from Ted Harvey, writing for  They concern one of the most significant alleged offenses committed by Hillary Clinton and her presidential campaign…but, in this case, one that is almost completely unknown to the public.

Why would this be?  Keep reading:

Last year, the Committee to Defend the President filed a complaint with the FEC, documenting “an unprecedented, massive, nationwide multi-million dollar conspiracy” carried out by the Clinton machine. The Committee’s 101-page complaint was built entirely on FEC reports filed by Democrats, memos authored by Clinton campaign manager Robbie Mook, and public statements from former Democratic National Committee chairwoman Donna Brazile, among others.

It’s been over 250 days since the complaint was filed — and counting.

The Democrat Party establishment stands accused of steering $84 million in illegal straw man contributions to Clinton’s campaign — an exponentially more sophisticated money laundering scheme than the one carried out by conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza in 2012.

D’Souza was sentenced to eight months in a community confinement center and five years of probation for a campaign finance violation that amounted to $20,000.Clinton’s money laundering scheme is more than 4,000 times larger. In other words, the $84 million scheme amounts to the single largest campaign finance scandal in U.S. history.

And yet the liberal media has deemed the scandal unworthy of its coverage, even though the Committee’s complaint has resulted in an ongoing federal investigation. Months have passed since that investigation was opened, and the likes of The New York Times, CNN, and MSNBC refuse to cover it. Ditto for CBS, ABC, and NBC — only crickets.

Is this complaint valid?  Does this pro-Trump group have a point?  I don’t know.

But I do know that, even as media enter their third year covering alleged “collusion” between Donald Trump and Russia – which, to this moment, are based on exactly no evidence – the accusation of $84 million illegally appropriated dollars on behalf of 2016’s Democrat Presidential candidate has, to my knowledge, received zero coverage by mainstream media…

…the same mainstream media which also has provided virtually no coverage of fully evidenced collusion between Hillary Clinton’s campaign and foreign nationals – including Russian foreign nationals – and have barely covered her email scandal, which made all the information she got as Secretary of State for four years fully available to our enemies.

Mr. Harvey wins Paragraphs Of The Day honors for calling this to our attention.

But let’s never forget that the far bigger scandal is mainstream media’s suppression and burial of every Hillary Clinton scandal associated with the 2016 campaign.  They not only have given a free pass for the lies and corruption of Hillary Clinton, but have managed to destroy their own reputations in the course of doing so.

Great job, guys.  No one can say you didn’t accomplish anything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *