THE NEW YORK POST EDITORIAL ON SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP

This is the second time in recent weeks I am breaking my usual policy and posting someone else’s material in its entirety – which I would only do if I think the contents are especially important and timely.

Following is the editorial in today’s New York Post, regarding testimony given in the senate yesterday about censorship by our major social media platforms – particularly that of twitter CEO Jack Dorsey:

tWITTER IS RUNNING A BLACKMAIL OPERATION – COOPERATE OR NO TRAFFIC FOR YOUBy
Post Editorial Board  October 28, 2020 | 6:46pm

For all their talk of “neutral platforms,” the Big Shots at Big Tech — Twitter, Facebook and Google — are running a protection racket. They figure they can dictate what Americans get to see and read, and what other media companies must do to reach the public via those platforms.

It’s a clear threat to a healthy democracy — and Congress has noticed. On Wednesday, the Senate launched a hearing to investigate “Big Tech’s bad behavior.”

Center-stage: Twitter’s strong-arm tactics to censor The Post ever since we began reporting on Hunter Biden’s e-mails. First, it froze our account and banned our stories; then, amid a public backlash, it agreed to unfreeze us — but only if we deleted our original tweets.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey sounded like every mob enforcer and shakedown artist in history: Nice paper you got there, New York Post. Shame, should something happen to it. He knows full well media outlets depend on social media, and Google search algorithms, to help readers access our reporting.

Sen. Ted Cruz wasn’t fooled: “Mr. Dorsey, who the hell elected you and put you in charge of what the media are allowed to report, and what the American people are allowed to hear?” he thundered. “Why do you persist in behaving as a Democratic super PAC, silencing views to the contrary of your political beliefs?”

Dorsey tried to claim it was all a mistake that had been fixed, but The Post account remained locked, even as he spoke.

“Can the New York Post post on their Twitter account?” Cruz asked.

“If they go into their account . . . ” squirmed Dorsey, before Cruz cut him off.

“No, is your answer to that,” fumed Cruz, “unless they genuflect and agree with your dictates.”

Besides, if it was an honest error, then why do they only happen to one side? As Sen. Marsha Blackburn noted, Twitter has “censored” President Trump 65 times and Joe Biden zero. “There is a pattern of subjective manipulation of information.”

Nor can Twitter and Facebook, which also moved to suppress The Post’s reporting, claim there’s anything wrong with the stories. Asked if they had any “evidence” of that, Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg both admitted they didn’t.

Some folks think the paper should’ve just caved immediately and deleted the story. Yet the problem isn’t The Post’s failure to squelch stories — it’s Big Tech’s heavy-handed shakedown.

Is that editorial accurate? Reasonable?

Based on the facts it presents, what conclusions can you draw about these “Big Tech” giants…how desperate the need is for them to be regulated for fairness…and, given the clear direction of their partisanship, how unlikely that will be to occur in a Biden/Harris (or is it Harris/Biden) administration?

Think about it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *