Let me get this straight:
Michael Cohen once told congress that, prior to becoming President, Donald Trump did not explore the possibility of building a Trump Tower in Moscow.
Now, while trying to get a reduced sentence after being convicted of crimes that have nothing to do with Trump, he says that, prior to becoming President, Donald Trump did explore – but then discarded – the possibility of building a Trump Tower in Moscow.
The possibility that, if you believe Cohen, Trump considered building a tower in Moscow but decided against it, is supposed to stand as evidence that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election???
One of two things would cause you to buy into this:
-You are non compos mentis;
-You hate Trump enough so that a demonstrated liar’s claim that Trump, who has built in countries around the world, considered, but then decided against, building in Moscow, somehow incriminates him.
I challenge anyone to show me what this has to do with the claim that Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election.
And while I’m waiting, maybe you can tell me what crime it would have been even if he did do so.
Are you aware that “colluding” with people from another country to win an election, in and of itself, is not illegal? You’d never know that by the media coverage, would you?
But what about Hillary Clinton and her campaign? What about the fact that they hired Christopher Steele, the British national who used Russian sources to write a dossier with information even Steele acknowledges is unverified, and then used it to get the FISA warrants which generated mueller’s witch hunt in the first place?
Then again, why am I even asking? There’s no problem for Hillary and the people around her. They’re Democrats, neck-deep in the swamp. In other words, a protected species.