IS THE “WHISTLEBLOWER” A BIDEN ASSOCIATE NAMED ERIC CIARAMELLA?

Reports are now circulating – this one via Rob Crilly, Steven Nelson and David M. Drucker’s article for the Washington Examiner – that the “whistleblower” who claimed President Trump made an improper call to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, is a Joe Biden operative:

The 2020 Democratic candidate with whom the CIA whistleblower had a “professional” tie is Joe Biden, according to intelligence officers and former White House officials.

Lawyers for the whistleblower said he had worked only “in the executive branch.” The Washington Examiner has established that he is a career CIA analyst who was detailed to the National Security Council at the White House and has since left. On Sept. 26, the New York Times reported that he was a CIA officer. On Oct. 4, the newspaper added that he “was detailed to the National Security Council at one point.”

A retired CIA officer told the Washington Examiner, “From everything we know about the whistleblower and his work in the executive branch then, there is absolutely no doubt he would have been working with Biden when he was vice president.”

Is this true?  From one report alone, which does not contain hard evidence but only speculation, we do not know.

But other sources – none of which I’m familiar with, so I’m not attributing them here – are claiming to know, specifically, who the “whistleblower” is:

His name is Eric Ciaramella – a former assistant to National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster and dedicated anti-Trumper.

Let me be very clear about this.  I do NOT know if this is true.  I do NOT know if the “whistleblower” is Eric Ciaramella.

And, it should be pointed out, I also do not know what difference it makes, at this point, who the “whistleblower” is anyway – since, when President Trump released the transcript of his conversation, so we all know what he and President Zelensky discussed, he made the issue moot.

But, for whatever it’s worth, there it is.

Now let’s see which mainstream media, if any, confirm or debunk any of the above information.

6 Comments

  • Miss Guillotine must meet & fall in love with many democratic politicians. Love them miss Guillotine to your ever lasting & eternal satisfaction.

  • Eric Ciaramella IS THE WHISTLEBLOWER.
    AG BARR , time to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate mAdan Schiff and his co-conspirators , Nadler, Pelosi, Cummings and especially this NOW OUTED AMERICAN TRAITOR Eric Ciaramella.
    WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND HE BE INDICTED FOR TREASON SEDITION AND HIGH CRIMES, ARRESTED TRIED CONVICTED AND EXECUTED MAS THE TREACHEROUS TRAITOR HE IS !
    PAST TIME THESE MAGGOTS ATTEMPTING A COUP DETAT
    TO REMOVE OUR LEGALLY ELECTED 45th PRESIDENT BE SEVERLY PUNISHED !

  • So ignorant individuals such as “Carsrus” are the reason the identity of Whistleblowers must be protected. Misplaced anger, hatred and calling for violent revenge are all too commonplace among the Trumps and their loyalists. We’ve known the unjust reality of the “kill the messenger” mindset throughout history. Believe it is alive and well in this frenzy to unmask this Whistleblower. And know Ken Berwitz, that if anything happens to the person you have named or their family, you will rightfully shoulder some blame.

  • So ignorant individuals such as “Carsrus” are the reason the identity of Whistleblowers must be protected. Misplaced anger, hatred and calling for violent revenge are all too commonplace among the Trumps and their loyalists. We’ve known the unjust reality of the “kill the messenger” mindset throughout history. Believe it is alive and well in this frenzy to unmask this Whistleblower. And know Ken Berwitz, that if anything happens to the person you have named or their family, you will rightfully shoulder some blame. Poor journalism at its best.

    • KR, Your beef should be woth the washington examiner, not Ken. In fact wrote this about the person in question –

      Let me be very clear about this. I do NOT know if this is true. I do NOT know if the “whistleblower” is Eric Ciaramella.

      And, it should be pointed out, I also do not know what difference it makes, at this point, who the “whistleblower” is anyway –

      • So why write an article about it then? Just spreads either disinformation or correct identification of a person whose identity was supposed to be protected…and either way, putting the named person and or their family at possible risk of negative results from that public identification. Seems like irresponsible journalism any way you look at it.

Leave a Reply to CARSRUS Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *