BETTIE COOK SCOTT’S “APOLOGY”

Yesterday I posted an installment of my “Real Racism” series, citing Pennsylvania State Representative bettie cook scott who, in the course of running in the Democrat primary for State Senate against a Chinese opponent,  Stephanie Chang, used a barrage of ugly, hateful language against her.

Ms. Chang, I am happy to say, cleaned her clock in that primary, winning with more than four times as many votes as scott got.

Well, now – three days later and, I suspect, after being reamed by the state party, scott has apologized.

Here are her exact words.  Take a look and see if they make you a believer:

“I deeply regret the comments I made that have proven hurtful to so many.  Those are words I never should have said.

“I humbly apologize to Representative Chang, her husband, Mr. Gray, and to the broader Asian American community for those disparaging remarks. In the divisive age we find ourselves in, I should not contribute further to that divisiveness.

“I have reached out to Representative Chang to meet with her so that I may apologize to her in person. I pray she and the Asian American community can find it in their hearts to forgive me.”

The good news?  Those are exactly the words that should have been said.

The bad news?  It is extremely hard to believe scott’s sincerity, given her continuous use of derogatory racial terms for Ms. Chang, her stated disgust that Chinese people are coming to the United States, and the fact that scott called Ms. Chang’s (Black) husband “a fool” for marrying her.

Personally, though I wish I could buy the premise that bettie cook scott’s apology is from the heart, I can’t.

If she had made just one or two such comments, maybe I could ascribe it to a “heat of the moment” lapse.  But her extensive barrage of hate went 1,000 miles beyond that point.   To me, it is far more logical that she is trying to salvage her political career than seriously making amends to Stephanie Chang.

What do you think?

2 Comments

  • “…Winston turned a little sideways in his chair to drink his mug of coffee. At the table on his left the man with the strident voice was still talking remorselessly away….He held some important post in the FICTION DEPARTMENT….It was just a noise, a quack-quack-quacking….Every word of it was pure orthodoxy, pure Ingsoc….Winston had a curious feeling that this was not a real human being but some kind of dummy. It was not the man’s brain that was speaking, it was his larynx. The stuff that was coming out of him consisted of words, but it was not speech in the true sense: it was noise uttered in unconsciousness, like the quacking of a duck.”

    That’s what I think whenever I see some liberal who has to apologize for doing what they always do. They just say what they were told to say. It was not Scott’s brain speaking, it was her larynx. It was noise uttered in unconsciousness, like the quacking of a duck.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *